International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering, Science, and Management
Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 41-48, Jan-Mar 2025.
https://doi.org/10.58482/ijeresm.v4i1.6

Digital Literacy and E-learning Adoption Among Commerce Students: Challenges and Opportunities in Bhokardan

Satish Dhoke

Associate Professor & Head, Department of Commerce, Moreshwar Arts, Science and Commerce College, Bhokardan, Maharashtra, India.

Abstract: The rapid advancement of digital technology has transformed education, making e-learning a vital instructional method. However, its adoption in rural areas, particularly among commerce students in Bhokardan, presents significant challenges. This study explores the level of digital literacy among students and identifies the barriers to e-learning adoption, focusing on factors such as resource limitations, digital infrastructure, and student readiness. A sample of 100 students was analyzed using the Chi-square test to examine the relationship between digital literacy, resource availability, and e-learning adoption. The findings indicate that low digital literacy serves as a significant barrier. At the same time, limited access to devices and unreliable internet connectivity also hinder adoption, though their impact is statistically less significant. Despite these obstacles, the study highlights opportunities to enhance e-learning through targeted digital literacy training and improved access to technological resources. The results emphasize the need for strategic interventions to strengthen digital literacy and infrastructure, which could significantly improve educational outcomes in rural areas.

 

Keywords: Bhokardan, Digital Divide, Digital Literacy, E-learning Adoption, Infrastructure Barriers, Rural Education.

References:

  1. N. Hussain and S. Phulpoto, “Digital Literacy: Empowering individuals in the digital age,” Assyfa Learning Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 70–83, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.61650/alj.v2i2.231.
  2. D. Stokols, “Rise of the Internet—Navigating our online and Place-Based ecologies,” in Elsevier eBooks, 2018, pp. 89–136. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-803113-1.00004-1.
  3. G. S. Olanrewaju, S. B. Adebayo, A. Y. Omotosho, and C. F. Olajide, “Left behind? The effects of digital gaps on e-learning in rural secondary schools and remote communities across Nigeria during the COVID19 pandemic,” International Journal of Educational Research Open, vol. 2, p. 100092, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100092.
  4. M. M. H. Raihan, S. Subroto, N. Chowdhury, K. Koch, E. Ruttan, and T. C. Turin, “Dimensions and barriers for digital (in)equity and digital divide: a systematic integrative review,” Digital Transformation and Society, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1108/dts-04-2024-0054.
  5. D. Mhlanga, “Digital transformation of education, the limitations and prospects of introducing the fourth industrial revolution asynchronous online learning in emerging markets,” Discover Education, vol. 3, no. 1, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44217-024-00115-9.
  6. J. A. G. M. Van Dijk, “Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings,” Poetics, vol. 34, no. 4–5, pp. 221–235, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004.
  7. J. Zhang, D. Wang, M. Ji, K. Yu, M. Qi, and H. Wang, “Digital literacy, relative poverty, and common prosperity for rural households: Evidence from Chinese Family Panel Survey (CFPS) 2018,” International Review of Financial Analysis, vol. 96, p. 103739, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103739.
  8. P. Reddy, K. Chaudhary, and S. Hussein, “A digital literacy model to narrow the digital literacy skills gap,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 4, p. e14878, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14878.
  9. L. Gurung and P. K. Paudel, “Digital divide in the COVID-19 context: A case of Nepal,” Journal of Education and Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–5, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.51474/jer.v11i2.554.
  10. J. Weerapperuma, D. Nawinna and N. Gamage, “Digital Learning Challenges in Tertiary Education in Sri Lanka: A Social Capital Perspective,” in IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 3311-3328, June 2024, doi: 10.1109/TCSS.2023.3306571.
  11. S. Sindakis and G. Showkat, “The digital revolution in India: bridging the gap in rural technology adoption,” Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, vol. 13, no. 1, May 2024, doi: 10.1186/s13731-024-00380-w.
  12. W. Ng, “Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?,” Computers & Education, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1065–1078, May 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016.
  13. Neil Selwyn, Is Technology Good for Education?. Wiley, 2016.
  14. F. Mustafa, H. T. M. Nguyen, and X. Gao, “The challenges and solutions of technology integration in rural schools: A systematic literature review,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 126, p. 102380, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102380.
  15. S. Sato, “Digital divide in rural India: The role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in development,” Authorea (Authorea), Oct. 2024, doi: 10.22541/au.172979366.67985264/v1.
  16. B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, and M. Baki, “The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature,” Teachers College Record the Voice of Scholarship in Education, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 1–47, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1177/016146811311500307.
  17. S. Hrastinski, “A theory of online learning as online participation,” Computers & Education, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 78–82, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009.
  18. A. Ragni, D. Ippolito, and C. Masci, “Assessing the impact of hybrid teaching on students’ academic performance via multilevel propensity score-based techniques,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 92, p. 101824, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2024.101824.
Download PDF