Unveiling Experiential Learning: Saudi Female Undergraduates' Perceptions and Challenges in the Marshmallow Challenge within OB Class

Tahreem Noor Khan

Assistant Professor, College of Business Administration, University of Hail, Saudi Arabia

Abstract: The Marshmallow Challenge, a popular activity in classrooms and team-building exercises in offices promotes teamwork, communication, and collaboration. Despite its widespread use, its application within the Saudi educational context remains underexplored. Therefore, this research delves into the experiences and perceptions of 43 Saudi female undergraduate students participating in the Marshmallow Challenge in Organizational Behaviour (OB) class at the University of Hail, Saudi Arabia. Utilizing semi-structured interviews, the study aims to understand the nuances of this experiential learning activity, focusing on teamwork, communication, leadership, collaboration, and related responses. The findings reveal a spectrum of reactions from initial apprehension and nervousness to subsequent collaborative problem-solving and reflection.  Ultimately, this research paper contributes to the broader literature on experiential learning in OB education, offering educators actionable insights to optimize student engagement, collaboration, and skill learning.

Keywords: collaborative problem-solving, experiential learning, marshmallow challenge, organizational behavior

References:

  1. T. Dow and O. Lipatova, “The Dark Triad moderates the effect of winning a competitive, creative problem solving group task on oxytocin but not cortisol,” Research Square (Research Square), Aug. 2023, doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3218514/v1.
  2. Wujec, T., “Build a tower, build a team,” TED Talks. https://www.ted.com/talks/tom_wujec_build_a_tower?language=en accessed on Dec. 3, 2023.
  3. Reeping D., & Reid K., “The marshmallow metaphor: Iterative design tailored to 6th graders,” In Proceedings of the North Central Section, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition., 2013.
  4. D. Elsbach and I. Stigliani, “Design Thinking and Organizational Culture: A review and framework for future research,” Journal of Management, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 2274–2306, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0149206317744252.
  5. Korach C. S., & Gargac J., “Integrating entrepreneurial mind-set into first-year engineering curriculum through active learning exercises,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2009.
  6. Kiyani M., Haider I., & Javed F., “Stem Play Area Project: Low-cost STEM activities using household items for students in underserved community,” ICERI Proceedings, 4845-4853, 2020.
  7. Kiyani Z., Hussain T., & Qureshi S. B. “Breaking barriers: Using STEM activities to engage and spark the interest of underprivileged Pakistani students,” Education Sciences, 10(8), 220.
  8. J. Hughes and C. Denson, “Scaffolding middle and high school students’ engineering design experiences: Quality Problem-SCOPEing Promoting Successful Solutions,” Journal of Technology Education, vol. 32, no. 2, p. 4, May 2021, doi: 10.21061/jte.v32i2.a.1.
  9. Micheli, S. J. S. Wilner, S. H. Bhatti, M. Mura, and M. Beverland, “Doing Design Thinking: conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 124–148, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1111/jpim.12466.
  10. B. Paulus and V. Brown, “Enhancing ideational creativity in groups,” in Oxford University Press eBooks, 2003, pp. 110–136. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0006.
  11. Dorst K., “The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application,” Design Studies, 32(6), pp. 521-532, 2011.
  12. Tuckman B. W., “Developmental sequence in small groups,” Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), pp. 384-399, 1965.
  13. Condoor S. S., Keogh G., “Work in progress: Weekly innovation challenge: Changing the mindset one step at a time every week,” In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1-6, 2012.
  14. Zhou N. et al., “Developing middle school students’ engineering design concepts through toy design workshop,” In Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 1-6, 2016.
  15. Suzuki, H. Shoda, M. Sakata, and K. Inada, “Essential tips for successful collaboration – a case study of the ‘Marshmallow Challenge,’” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2016, pp. 81–89. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40397-7_9.
  16. Klotz L. D., & Nemeth C. J. “Benefits of random search for creative group solutions,” Psychological Science, 6(5), pp. 346-350, 1995.
  17. Zappe S. E., Litzinger T. A., & Hunter S. T., “Integrating the creative process into engineering courses: Description and assessment of a faculty workshop,” In Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 1-6, 2012.
  18. A. Mello, “Improving individual member accountability in small work group settings,” Journal of Management Education, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 253–259, May 1993, doi: 10.1177/105256299301700210.
  19. Hoegl and H. G. Gemuenden, “Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence,” Organization Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 435–449, Aug. 2001, doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635.
  20. Christensen, Clayton M. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
  21. De Dreu C. K., & Nijstad B. A., „The social dilemma of creative teams: Balancing social cohesion with cognitive diversity,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(2), 185-195, 2011.
  22. Patterson, P. Warr, and M. West, “Organizational climate and company productivity: The role of employee affect and employee level,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 193–216, Jun. 2004, doi: 10.1348/096317904774202144.
  23. Mayer J. D., Salovey P., & Caruso D. R. “Emotional intelligence: Theory, research, and applications,” Psychological Inquiry, 15(3), pp. 197-215, 2004.
  24. Amabile T. M., “How to kill creativity ?,” Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 76-87, 1998.
  25. Goncalo S. I., Gruenfeld D. A., “The dynamic dance of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation in teams: Towards a more nuanced understanding of creativity,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 41, pp. 87-108, 2020.
  26. Häggström, M., Hansen, L. K., “Novelty seeking and social media use: A review of the literature and proposed research agenda,”. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, pp. 356-362, 2017.
  27. Van den Bosch F. A., Verhulp C. „Fear of failure, negative evaluation, and the choice to speak up in groups,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), pp. 573-587, 2017.
  28. Gupta K., Somers R. L., “Time pressure and creativity: Understanding the relationship and its implications for project management,” International Journal of Project Management, 53, 2023.
  29. E. Flegal and M. C. Anderson, “Overthinking skilled motor performance: Or why those who teach can’t do,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 927–932, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.5.927.
  30. Dhiman and P. Varma, “A Differential Study of Compulsive Usage of WhatsApp,” International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering, Science, and Management, vol. 2, no. 1. JPM Publishers, 2023. doi: 10.58482/ijeresm.v2i1.5.
  31. N. Islam, U. S. Abubakar, and M. Bello, “Influence of Study Skills Training in Reducing Poor Study Habits among School Students,” International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering, Science, and Management, vol. 2, no. 1. JPM Publishers, 2023. doi: 10.58482/ijeresm.v2i1.7.
Download PDF