International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering, Science, and Management
Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 01-05, Apr-Jun 2024.
https://doi.org/10.58482/ijeresm.v3i2.1

An Impact of Social Marketing on Smoking and Tobacco Consumption

1Ruchi Kansal

2Mahtab Ahmed

1Associate Professor, Maharaja Agrasen Himalayan Garhwal University, Uttrakhand, India

2Research Scholar, Maharaja Agrasen Himalayan Garhwal University, Uttrakhand, India

Abstract: The paper discusses the role of social marketing in preventing health-related harmful habits such as tobacco consumption and smoking. These habits are the causes of deadly diseases such as lung cancer, tuberculosis, and other chronic infections which are detrimental to life of the people. Children fall prey to the wrong habits in the wrong company and become tobacco addicts. So many cases of teen drug addicts are reported in a large number. They have a lack of conscience at a tender age and negligence of their counselling and awareness increases the number of smokers, drunkards, and drug addicts. Once they are afflicted with the diseases they must run for medicines and treatment. Therefore, it should be prevented before suffering as the saying goes, “Prevention is better than cure “. They are unaware that they are prevented not only by clinical treatment and medicines but also by social awareness and education. Social mobilization of the people through awareness programs, education, camps, campaigns, etc. is known as social marketing. The significance of social marketing is its effects on the prevention of physically detrimental habits in the youth which contributed a lot to the reduction of cases of diseases. The role of government programs, educational and medical institutions, social workers, and NGOs is worth applauding in India which undertake and complete projects, organize awareness camps, and educate parents and youths to save themselves from the consumption of harmful substances. It has also produced good output in India that the cases of smoking and drug addiction have reduced to support the country’s development as India is advancing towards becoming the third largest economy and a developed country by 2030 and 2047 respectively.

Keywords: detrimental habits, disease prevention, health awareness, smoking, social marketing, social mobilization.

References:

  1. Shiu, L. M. Hassan, and G. Walsh, “Demarketing tobacco through governmental policies – The 4Ps revisited,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 269–278, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.034.
  2. Mishra, S. Pimple, and S. Shastri, “An overview of the tobacco problem in India,” Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology, vol. 33, no. 03, pp. 139–145, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.103139.
  3. Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) India report 2009–2010,” Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, 2011.
  4. Hiscock, L. Bauld, A. Amos, J. A. Fidler, and M. R. Munafò, “Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1248, no. 1, pp. 107–123, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x.
  5. Lee, B. D. Cutler, and J. L. Burns, “The marketing and demarketing of tobacco products to Low-Income African-Americans,” Health Marketing Quarterly (Print), vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 51–68, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1300/j026v22n02_04.
  6. M. John, P. Sinha, V. G. Munish, and F. Tullu, “Economic costs of diseases and deaths attributable to tobacco use in India, 2017–2018,” Nicotine & Tobacco Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 294–301, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa154.
  7. Ismail et al., “Effectiveness of a social marketing mix intervention on changing the smoking behavior of santri in traditional Islamic boarding schools in Indonesia,” Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 586–594, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3961/jpmph.22.231.
  8. Thakur, S. Prinja, N. Bhatnagar, S. K. Rana, D. N. Sinha, and P. Singh, “Widespread inequalities in smoking & smokeless tobacco consumption across wealth quintiles in States of India: Need for targeted interventions,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 141, no. 6, p. 789, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.160704.
  9. Lawther, G. Hastings, and R. Lowry, “De‐marketing: Putting Kotler and levy’s ideas into practice,” MM. Journal Of Marketing Management, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 315–325, May 1997, doi: 10.1080/0267257x.1997.9964475.
  10. Moore, “The Sociological impact of attitudes toward smoking: Secondary effects of the Demarketing of smoking,” The Journal of Social Psychology/Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 145, no. 6, pp. 703–718, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.3200/socp.145.6.704-718.
  11. L. Comm, “Demarketing products which may pose health risks,” Health Marketing Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 95–102, Mar. 1998, doi: 10.1300/j026v15n01_06.
  12. Cullwick, Positioning de-marketing strategy,” The Journal of Marketing, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 51-57, 1975.
  13. Fallin‐Bennett, K. A. Parker, A. Miller, K. Ashford, and E. J. Hahn, “Smoking and Tobacco-Free Policies in Women’s Residential Substance Use Disorder Treatment Facilities: A Community-Engaged Approach,” Nicotine & Tobacco Research, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1386–1392, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx211.
  14. K. Khuwaja et al., “Preventable Lifestyle Risk Factors for Non-Communicable Diseases in the Pakistan Adolescents Schools Study 1 (PASS-1),” Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 210–217, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2011.44.5.210.
  15. Tselengidis, S. Dance, S. Adams, B. Freeman, and J. Cranwell, “Tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship ban adoption: A pilot study of the reporting challenges faced by low- and middle-income countries,” Tobacco Induced Diseases (Online), vol. 21, no. January, pp. 1–14, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.18332/tid/155816.
  16. Rezaei and F. Farzadfar, “Points to consider regarding tobacco hindrance,” Archives of Iranian Medicine, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 353–355, May 2020, doi: 10.34172/aim.2020.25.
  17. A. Smith and R. E. Malon, “An argument for phasing out sales of cigarettes,” Tobacco Control, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 703–708, 2022.
  18. WHO global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco use 2000-2025,Third Edition, Geneva, World Health Organization, 2019.
  19. R. Sharapova, C. Reyes-Guzman, T. Singh, E. Phillips, K. Marynak, and I. Agaku, “Age of tobacco use initiation and association with current use and nicotine dependence among US middle and high school students, 2014–2016,” Tobacco Control, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 49–54, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054593.
  20. M. John, P. Sinha, V. G. Munish, and F. Tullu, “Economic costs of diseases and deaths attributable to tobacco use in India, 2017–2018,” Nicotine & Tobacco Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 294–301, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa154.
  21. Shaikh, F. Janssen, and T. Vogt, “The progression of the tobacco epidemic in India on the national and regional level, 1998-2016,” BMC Public Health (Online), vol. 22, no. 1, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12261-y.
  22. N. Islam, U. S. Abubakar, and M. Bello, “Social Vices: Causes and Counselling Remedies,” International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering, Science, and Management, vol. 2, no. 1. JPM Publishers, 2023. doi: 10.58482/ijeresm.v2i1.1.
  23. N. Islam, U. S. Abubakar, and M. Bello, “Influence of Study Skills Training in Reducing Poor Study Habits among School Students,” International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering, Science, and Management, vol. 2, no. 1. JPM Publishers, 2023. doi: 10.58482/ijeresm.v2i1.7.