International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering, Science, and Management
Vol. 5, Issue 3, pp. 55-65, Jul-Sep 2026.
https://doi.org/10.58482/ijeresm.v5i3.4

Received: 02 Apr 2026 | Revised: 09 Jun 2026 | Accepted: 16 Jul 2026 | Published: 25 Jul 2026

Village-Level Assessment of Potential Surface Water Storage Using an Integrated Water Balance Approach in the Ippala Vagu Watershed, India

1J. Rangaiah 

2V. Mallikarjuna

3P. Udaya Bhaskar

1Department of Civil Engineering, Lakireddy Bali Reddy College of Engineering, Mylavaram, JNTUK, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India.

2Department of Civil Engineering, Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education, Deemed to be University, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India.

3Department of Civil Engineering, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kakinada, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Abstract: The management of watersheds requires the planning of surface water resources. For hydrological analysis, runoff estimation is essential. This study aimed to estimate the village-level potential surface water storage by integrating the water balance components, including surface runoff, groundwater recharge, and effective rainfall. Surface runoff was estimated using the Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN), groundwater recharge was estimated by the Rainfall Infiltration Factor (RIF), and effective rainfall was estimated by Food and Agriculture Organization/ Agricultural Water Management Group (FAO/AGLW) approaches. Using rainfall data, water balance calculations were performed for the 18 villages within the Ippala Vagu Watershed to evaluate potential surface water storage. In total, 18 villages recorded an annual rainfall volume of 430.50 million cubic meters (MCM), of which 138.24 MCM (32.11%) was estimated as effective rainfall. Surface runoff constituted 71.57 MCM (16.62%), while groundwater recharge was estimated at 68.88 MCM (16.00%). The potential surface water storage amounted to 151.82 MCM, representing 35.27% of the annual precipitation volume. The current storage capacity was merely 73.67 MCM, constituting 48.52% of the potential surface water storage. These findings indicate considerable potential for improving the utilization of available surface water resources within the watershed. Accordingly, increasing water harvesting and storage facilities, especially in villages with high potential surface water storage, is recommended.

Keywords: Surface Runoff, Effective Rainfall, Potential Surface Water Storage, Geographic Information System, SCS-CN Method, Rainfall Infiltration Factor.

References
  1. S. Verma, R. K. Verma, S. K. Mishra, A. Singh, and G. K. Jayaraj, “A revisit of NRCS-CN inspired models coupled with RS and GIS for runoff estimation,” Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 1891-1930, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1334166
  2. Sewmehon Sisay Fanta and Tolera Abdissa Feyissa, “Performance evaluation of HEC-HMS model for continuous runoff simulation of Gilgel Gibe watershed, Southwest Ethiopia,” Journal of Water and Land Development, vol. 50, pp. 85-97, 2021. https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2021.138185
  3. W. Zhao, Y. Hao, Y. Zhang, H. Yu, and X. Li, “Watershed runoff simulation and prediction based on BMA coupled SWAT-LSTM model,” Hydrology, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 312, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12120312
  4. S. Chiang, C.-H. Chang, and W.-B. Chen, “Comparison of Rainfall-Runoff Simulation between Support Vector Regression and HEC-HMS for a Rural Watershed in Taiwan,” Water, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 191, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020191
  5. A. N. A. Hamdan, S. Almuktar, and M. Scholz, “Rainfall-Runoff modeling using the HEC-HMS model for the Al-Adhaim River catchment, northern Iraq,” Hydrology, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 58, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020058
  6. Pradip Dalavi, S. R. Bhakar, H. N. Bhange, and B. K. Gavit, “Assessment of Empirical Methods for Runoff Estimation in Chaskaman Catchment of Western Maharashtra,” International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1511-1515, 2018. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.177
  7. A. Sarminingsih, A. Rezagama, and Ridwan, “Simulation of Rainfall-runoff process using HEC-HMS model for Garang Watershed, Semarang, Indonesia,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1217, no. 1, p. 012134, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1217/1/012134
  8. USDA NRCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release 55, Conservation Engineering Division, Jun. 1986.
  9. I. Iskender and N. Sajikumar, “Evaluation of surface runoff estimation in ungauged watersheds using SWAT and GIUH,” Procedia Technology, vol. 24, pp. 109-115, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.016
  10. S. Satheeshkumar, S. Venkateswaran, and R. Kannan, “Rainfall-runoff estimation using SCS-CN and GIS approach in the Pappiredipatti watershed of the Vaniyar sub basin, South India,” Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0301-4
  11. M. Kumari, Diksha, P. Kalita, V. N. Mishra, A. Choudhary, and H. G. Abdo, “Rainfall-runoff modelling using GIS based SCS-CN method in Umiam catchment region, Meghalaya, India,” Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, vol. 135, p. 103634, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2024.103634
  12. R. Viji, P. R. Prasanna, and R. Ilangovan, “Modified SCS-CN and Green-AMPT methods in surface runoff modelling for the Kundahpallam Watershed, Nilgiris, Western Ghats, India,” Aquatic Procedia, vol. 4, pp. 677-684, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.087
  13. P. Afrasiabikia, A. P. Rizi, and L. Brocca, “Improving the SCS-CN method based on adjusting the main parameters using rainfall-runoff data,” Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies, vol. 62, p. 102899, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102899
  14. S. Ranjan and V. Singh, “HEC-HMS based rainfall-runoff model for Punpun river basin,” Water Practice & Technology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 986-1001, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2022.033
  15. M. Abraham and R. A. Mathew, “Assessment of surface runoff for tank watershed in Tamil Nadu using hydrologic modeling,” International Journal of Geophysics, vol. 2018, pp. 1-10, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2498648
  16. M. V. Herbei et al., “Rainfall-runoff modeling based on HEC-HMS model: a case study in an area with increased groundwater discharge potential,” Frontiers in Water, vol. 6, p. 1474990, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2024.1474990
  17. Laith Abdulsattar Jabbar, Ibrahim Abdulrazak Khalil, and Lariyah Mohd Sidek, “HEC-HMS hydrological modelling for runoff estimation in Cameron Highlands, Malaysia,” International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 40-51, 2021. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJCIET.12.9.2021.004
  18. S. Abraham, C. Huynh, and H. Vu, “Classification of Soils into Hydrologic Groups Using Machine Learning,” Data, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 2, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5010002
  19. K. Subramanya, Engineering Hydrology, 3rd ed. New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, 2008.
  20. Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), Report of the Ground Water Resource Estimation Committee (GEC-2015), Ministry of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation, Government of India, New Delhi, India, Oct. 2017.
  21. J. Hu, “Deep Learning-Based Rainfall-Runoff Modeling for River Basin Water Resource Prediction,” in 2026 8th International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (ICHORA), Ankara, Turkiye, 2026, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHORA69329.2026.11537230
  22. Water Resources Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh Water Resources Information and Management System (APWRIMS). [Online]. Available: https://apwrims.ap.gov.in. Accessed: Jul. 25, 2026.
×

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by IJERESM. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Archiving: All articles are permanently archived in Zenodo IJERESM Community.